Skip to main content

Covid-19 notice

Our firm is open and available to help. In response to recent COVID-19 developments, we have enabled our staff to work remotely while maintaining our ability to protect and represent our clients. We are all being impacted in different ways, but we will get through this together.

Volkswagen

$TBD

Paynter Law represents a putative nationwide class of purchasers of purported “clean diesel” vehicles in which Volkswagen installed software allowing the vehicles to cheat on emissions tests. The putative class consists of consumers who paid a premium for their vehicles but were excluded from prior settlements.

Volkswagen Litigation

Pending Consumer Class Action

In late 2015, Volkswagen shocked the automobile market by admitting that it had built a mechanism into its purportedly “clean” diesel vehicles that caused the vehicles to cheat on U.S. emissions tests. Hundreds of lawsuits were filed immediately after this fraud was revealed, and VW quickly moved to settle with hundreds of thousands of affected consumers.

But VW excluded from the settlements consumers who purchased or leased VW’s “clean” diesel vehicles, but who no longer owned the vehicles at the time the fraud was announced.

In August 2017, Paynter Law together with Hagens Berman Sobol & Shapiro sued VW and its co-conspirator Bosch, on behalf of these excluded consumers. The class action lawsuit, Nemet v. Volkswagen Group of America Inc., et al., No. 3:17-cv-04372 (N.D. Cal., Filed Aug. 2, 2017), alleged that plaintiffs paid a premium for their diesel vehicles, and were thus harmed by VW’s fraud.

VW and Bosch sought to have the case dismissed, arguing that the new plaintiffs were not harmed because they sold their vehicles before the public became aware of the emissions cheating; however, in a hearing in October 2018, Judge Charles Breyer, of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, disagreed, siding with the consumer plaintiffs and allowing their case to move forward. Judge Breyer noted that plaintiffs had alleged they paid a premium for their vehicles, and that “by increasing the cost of the cars, the premium also increased the amount by which the cars depreciated.” This extra depreciation meant that plaintiffs might still have been harmed by the fraud, even though they had sold their vehicles before the fraud was announced.

Judge Breyer’s decision paved the way for the discovery phase of the case, in which the parties will exchange documents and begin preparing the case for trial.

The lead attorneys on the case for the firm are Stuart Paynter, Celeste Boyd, and Jennifer Murray, and the firm is co-counsel in the action with the law firm of Hagens, Berman Sobol & Shapiro LLP, whose Managing Partner Steve Berman argued against VW’s motion at the August hearing before Judge Breyer.